The one area we continuously disagreed on was the issue of physical beauty and aesthetics. Now before today, I had disagreed with him about who we thought was attractive, who was "worth" talking to and setting up matches with. Sometimes I agreed with him in how we both didn't want to wrestle someone 40lbs over our own weight, mostly because of the size imbalance and the worry of injury. But today I noticed a more, well, uncomfortable side to this discussion. He commented to me that a man was hitting on him who was 80lbs over his weight limit and who consistently tried to set up a match with him, despite being turned down. The man in question, apparently, took great offense and said J was "not that attractive"- a rather natural reaction in my view to being rejected. I've felt that as well when guys either snub me or tell me they aren't interested. I realize the ego does that to save face.
But my friend's reaction irked me. Rather than brushing it off he ranted about how he was in the top 2-4% of attractiveness of all humans. I joked that he wasn't being too humble and he retorted that he was being humble, just taking pride in himself. I then said I was referring to the notion that one could be within the top 2-4% of attractiveness. Now I am not aware of any "objective" scale of beauty to which one could apply to themselves. Most supposedly "objective" scales of beauty are actually based on Rennaissance or classical ideals of beauty which have proven to be Eurocentric in the extreme and limiting to a great many people even of European background. Objective in this case would need to be free of cultural bias, free of subjective understandings of beauty. Now things like the golden mean reveal mathematical "beauty" but when one applies it to aesthetics of human beings it comes up against deeply ingrained patterns and modes of behavior and beliefs. If one knows anything about Bourdieu's habitus one knows that (and I paraphrase grossly) these deeply ingrained and reproduced patterns of beliefs and structures become solidified in people's minds through relationships of power and become seen as natural. It is because of these deeply ingrained power systems that folk definitions of things like beauty and attractiveness tend to exclude non-white and darker skin, differently-abled bodies, fat, kinky or curly hair etc.
Words like athleticism, masculine, fitness etc. come to be code words that exclude a great many people and categorize them as undesirables. These are not natural or objective standards of beauty because they can and do shift over time; they vary across cultures, belief systems and even vary with regard to gender, race, class and sexual orientation. If all people operated under a standard, universal, and instinctual idea of beauty and bodily aesthetic, then you wouldn't have the Bear community, or feeders and eaters, or historical accounts that reveal that in our recent human past fat was indicative of health, beauty and wealth and desired, especially in times when food was hard to come by. Beauty is so complex and varied a concept that I doubt there can be any standard of beauty that is not subjective, much less able to be ranked.
Well needless to say my comments did not go over well. One comment that irked me through the entire debate was that he called people "whales". Well that did not sit well with me and I asked that he not use the term because it was demeaning to people. I write this long ambling blog post because the interaction made me wonder about my own prejudices against people based on size. The website we are both on has people list what body type they are interested in and I, to my own chagrin, stated I am interested in guys around my size. Now I realize I am no spring-chicken. I have a flabby stomach, pecs that droop and wobbly-bits around the waist and arms. But relative to many people I am small in frame, some might say twinkish (though i deny that label and hate it with a passion).
But that restriction, that limitation, tells a lot about us. We view body size and mass as having some importance when it comes to physical attractiveness. We like to say it's about "health" or "stamina" but the truth is it isn't. If it were about health we'd be looking for guys with blood pressures below 120/80 for an adult male or the optimal blood flow for extrenuous, physical activity like sex or even wrestling. We'd be talking about whether a guy can run up stairs without heaving rather than talk about waist in relation to shoulder width or whether a guy has a "gut". If it were about health we'd talk about a host of other measures besides appearance and size, but we don't. Now this is more than just a kink thing, it's more than just a gay thing - we see this attitude in practically every site, personals or comment about aesthetic beauty. Since this blog is about kink I'll limit it to that.
Now to me it makes some sense, in a wrestling fetish and even in bondage, to have a partner that is physically able and healthy. Such strenuous and stress-filled activity requires a particular stamina and flexibility to avoid dangerous things like heart attack, pinched nerves, choking, pulled muscles and worse. In wrestling specifically weight is important because weight imbalance between opponents can lead to injury, especially if both are novices and have little experience in the sport. During the winter of 2011 I wrestled a young man who was around 250lbs; I had decided to join a group that practiced wrestling moves and thought it would benefit me in my kinky life. Well I was paired with another novice who happened to outweigh me by at least 90lbs. He was tall and a former football player so it had nothing to do with "fat", but he was heavy. I suffered a pulled ankle tendon when he fell on top of me and it was totally my fault, I was the one who didn't know how to fall. But since then I have put a limitation to weight in my profiles. But a part of me wonders and realizes how much such a limitation smacks of fat-phobia.
I won't lie, I have sizeist tendencies. I have always been attracted to those guys who are lithe and have an "elvish" frame. They draw my attention and I am, admittedly, more willing to talk to them if they hit on me than guys with paunches or a little extra girth. It's a part of me that I'm barely coming to grips with and trying to work through. As I realized my own negative attitudes around fat I've tried to make myself more inviting to people of different bodies than my usual "type". My profile on the wrestling site states,
"I'm looking to have fun, any range of wrestling is good with me as long as it's
active and fun and not just going through the motions. Key word here is active, not
necessarily rough but requiring stamina and energy...
I prefer guys close to my body type, though slightly bigger in muscle is also a
welcome change of pace. I used to have an age limit but it really depends on the
fitness level of my opponent. If you are have trouble breathing or get tired easily
I will be cautious about wrestling you since I am not CPR certified."
Admittedly I'm still not happy with it. Before it used to be much more ageist and sizeist and in the use of English it is hard to skirt the line between discerning and exclusionary. I want to not sound this way but at the same time I know my body and deeply-brainwashed mind will react to specific body types and shapes. That isn't to say I haven't derived pleasure from "bigger" guys. The best (receptive) anal sex I ever had was with a guy who one could argue was "fat" but he made me laugh and cum, a lot. One of the better experiences at IML in 2012 was with a guy who was "overweight", he was an expert bondage master and so lovingly dominant and experienced I trusted him to lead me around the market tied to two other guys. And the guy at whose house I first met J also had a little more girth on him than the ideal, and i had a lovely time wrestling him because he was strong and this little jobber boy enjoyed being tossed about a bit.
In my personal life I've loved and been loved by friends and family (chosen and biological) who struggle with weight, fat and health and most importantly against society's attitudes about them. I've seen them diet, exercise and torture themselves to fit a certain ideal; and even though they are beautiful people I still see that look on their face when they realize they still don't fit that "beautiful" ideal. I see the pain and loss of self-esteem when they worry about how they look in specific clothes, or when they jokingly call themselves fat. It hurts because I don't like to see them in pain, pain that I know I can cause to strangers.
Despite these experiences though I still, sadly, judge the photos of guys online. I don't pay so much attention at gay bars to men who fit a specific shape and I unfortunately do have a "type". I am not a bear lover, at least not sexually, though I admire the joy they take in their bodies and how carefree they seem to be. I confess these things to make it known that I am not trying to critique from some lofty academic and progressive, queerer-than-thou perch. I don't have it figured out. I suffer through the questioning and nervousness that most socially conscious people do when they encounter racism, sexism, and all the other isms in their communities and most importantly in themselves. It's a questioning I think most gay men and especially kinksters need to go through, because as an excluded and marginalized class of people we should not be excluding others within our own communities. We should be questioning how easy it is for us to make fun of the "whales", the "old guys", the dikes or trannies, because we can. We should question why it makes us feel better and realize it stems from our own pathetic need to make ourselves feel better as men, as sexual beings, as ourselves.
If this made any sense or if you have any advice to offer please let me know. I'm still trying to grow.